PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Negative revenue growth while FSM stands at 25.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FSM's 65.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of FSM's 211.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of FSM's 211.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 132.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while FSM is at 133.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSM is at 133.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-7.83%
Negative OCF growth while FSM is at 45.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-109.37%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 89.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
436.30%
10Y CAGR of 436.30% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
232.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to FSM's 250.56%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
3.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 104.19%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 4302.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
275.62%
Below 50% of FSM's 3768.59%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-10.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM stands at 184.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
355.00%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 268.62%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
299.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 418.10%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-35.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 818.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 83.19%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 17.27%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while FSM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 5.34%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.73%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FSM's 207.27%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.