PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FSM's 4.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.27%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FSM's 2.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
9.27%
EBIT growth below 50% of FSM's 73.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
9.27%
Operating income growth under 50% of FSM's 73.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-92.92%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 172.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-94.44%
Negative EPS growth while FSM is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-94.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSM is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.61%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.88%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-60.06%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
17.39%
OCF growth under 50% of FSM's 191.28%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.48%
FCF growth under 50% of FSM's 280.79%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 155.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-11.70%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 1015.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
132.02%
Below 50% of FSM's 473.47%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-29.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM stands at 129.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
118.90%
Below 50% of FSM's 741.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FSM is 1126.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSM stands at 1026.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FSM's 83.09%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
40.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 14.67%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.67% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-64.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.13%
Asset growth at 50-75% of FSM's 3.51%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.66%
Similar to FSM's 2.74%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
0.03%
We have some new debt while FSM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.