PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.30%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.35%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
6.53%
Dividend growth of 6.53% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.00%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 29.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-875.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
425.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 43151.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 32.50%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-38.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
697.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with FSM's 702.87%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is at 209.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-53.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM stands at 27.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 267.75%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 9.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Negative near-term dividend growth while FSM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-43.68%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.44%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
126.58%
Debt growth far above FSM's 2.47%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.