PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.82%
Revenue growth under 50% of FSM's 46.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
27.82%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FSM's 78.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
33.04%
EBIT growth below 50% of FSM's 485.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
33.04%
Operating income growth under 50% of FSM's 485.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
37.61%
Net income growth under 50% of FSM's 944.07%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
35.71%
EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 883.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 874.77%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.90%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 8.05%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 9.12%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-47.91%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.34%
OCF growth under 50% of FSM's 2253.55%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-582.88%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 338.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
179.16%
10Y CAGR of 179.16% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
0.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 14.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
13.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 92.30%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
185.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 185.85% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-22.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is at 198.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
9.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 484.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
84.25%
Below 50% of FSM's 333.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-50.72%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FSM is 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSM is 4086.68%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
302.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 258.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
57.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with FSM's 56.61%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
20.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 37.59%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.03% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-56.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while FSM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-15.57%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 14.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 40.14%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.65%
Under 50% of FSM's 39.58%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
90.51%
We have some new debt while FSM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.