PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-37.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.50%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.50%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
31.79%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.30%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.30%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while FSM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while FSM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-52.12%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-25.13%
Negative OCF growth while FSM is at 36.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.96%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 187.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 62.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 42.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-3.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSM stands at 43.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-5.92%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM stands at 98.29%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
17.09%
Below 50% of FSM's 73.23%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
7.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 88.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
28.59%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
188.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
155.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 71.68%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
72.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 132.69%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
26.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 43.45%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
24.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 20.37%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
24.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.20% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
49.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 49.75% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
70.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 70.16% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-31.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 8.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.56%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.00%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-11.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.