PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.55%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
29.24%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
37.10%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.10%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
26.98%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
28.00%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
28.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.12%
Share count expansion well above FSM's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.26%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.79%
OCF growth above 1.5x FSM's 5.92%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
10.57%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 126.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 18.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
5.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 109.69%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
26.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 770.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
46.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 10.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
32.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 658.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
55.82%
Below 50% of FSM's 112.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-56.49%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
32.42%
Below 50% of FSM's 132.67%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
66.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 107.52%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
27.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 17.07%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
25.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 7.24%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
13.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 13.23% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
101.95%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.95% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
59.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 59.08% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-26.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-24.39%
Inventory is declining while FSM stands at 16.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.37%
Negative asset growth while FSM invests at 2.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.23%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
269.36%
Debt growth far above FSM's 14.47%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.