PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.55%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GFI's 3.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
20.55%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-8.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-56.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-83.65%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-83.65%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.10%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 6.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-92.10%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 13.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
26.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 8.24%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
26.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 35.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
21.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 18.32%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.99%
We show growth while GFI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 13.11%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.57%
Under 50% of GFI's 9.36%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.27%
SG&A growth of 300.27% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.