PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.50%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.30%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.62%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-5.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-16.06%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.34%
Share change of 0.34% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.65%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
141.24%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to GFI's 137.33%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
124.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 94.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.43%
Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-7.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 546.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
229.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 103.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
874.54%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1188.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 109.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-88.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while GFI is at 44.58%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.81%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x GFI's 7.05%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.70%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.06%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.