PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.55%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-29.83%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.91%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.31%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.01%
Share change of 4.01% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while GFI is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.69%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
115.32%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 137.33%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
59.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 94.05%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
46.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 57.40%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
580.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 201.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
89.09%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 99.42%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
506.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to GFI's 546.34%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
114.08%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to GFI's 103.80%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
934.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1372.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 109.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
249.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 44.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.67%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 7.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-27.61%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.67%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.