PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-82.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-95.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-362.24%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 197.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 193.46%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-325.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 181.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
16.15%
Share count expansion well above GFI's 3.90%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 18.74%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Positive OCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1.52%
Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
80.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-0.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while GFI stands at 19.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25090.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 39.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
89.40%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 50.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-966.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-585.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1055.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 69.96%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
129.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 27.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.08%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Positive asset growth while GFI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-9.40%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
5.91%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
SG&A growth of 34.39% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.