95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GFI's 19.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
45.14%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
50.25%
EBIT growth 50-75% of GFI's 86.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
50.25%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of GFI's 86.65%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
51.37%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 580.98%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.36%
EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 567.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 549.83%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
9.22%
Share count expansion well above GFI's 3.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.14%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 7.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
Positive OCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
140.85%
Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
235.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 134.18%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
179.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 59.00%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
33.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 22.11%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 301.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
53.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
Below 50% of GFI's 913.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
37.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 34.31%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 52.95%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
73.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 2.99%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while GFI shows 3.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.