95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.60%
Revenue growth under 50% of GFI's 8.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.21%
Negative gross profit growth while GFI is at 22.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.18%
Positive EBIT growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.18%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
7.19%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 31.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.89%
EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 30.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 36.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.06%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.02%
Reduced diluted shares while GFI is at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
199.89%
Dividend growth of 199.89% while GFI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.13%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
453.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x GFI's 106.65%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
571.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 241.92%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
174.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 67.56%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
295.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 100.94%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
9273.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 84.74%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
242.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 35.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
489.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 80.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
13730.08%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 133.52% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
280.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 68.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
321.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to GFI's 324.46%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
2138.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 384.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
158.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 4.46%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
128.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 21.19%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while GFI shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.04%
Asset growth of 4.04% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.81%
BV/share growth of 4.81% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-8.33%
We’re deleveraging while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.24%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 489.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.