Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Reduced diluted shares while GFI is at 0.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 143.52%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 47.11%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 19.35%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 31.01%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive OCF/share growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 92.87%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 869.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.