95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.43%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.43%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 20.26%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 21.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of GFI's 18.75%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.26%
Share change of 0.26% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-61.46%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.26%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
29250.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x GFI's 50.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
369.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 137.33%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
194.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 94.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
73.48%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 57.40%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 334.46%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.01%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 201.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
62.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 99.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
1508.48%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
165.13%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
7.72%
Below 50% of GFI's 103.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 109.50%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
62.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 44.58%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.94%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.