95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.53%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 21.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-7.83%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-109.37%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
436.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 137.33%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
232.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 94.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 57.40%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 334.46%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
275.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 201.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-10.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
355.00%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
299.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 546.34%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-35.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 103.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 109.50%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
41.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to GFI's 44.58%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while GFI invests at 129.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.93%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.