PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.53%
Negative gross profit growth while GFI is at 777.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.53%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.53%
Negative operating income growth while GFI is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.45%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 103.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-18.18%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 103.85%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 103.08%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 29.44%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 29.44%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 19.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
1085.59%
FCF growth above 1.5x GFI's 211.43%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 13.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-24.65%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 200.59%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
222.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 17.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 137.76% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
186.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 134.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-57.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5331.89%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
123.30%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
41.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.24% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 317.42% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
57.80%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Asset growth above 1.5x GFI's 0.12%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.92%
Positive BV/share change while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.02%
We have some new debt while GFI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 30.90%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.