PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Positive revenue growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
29.46%
Gross profit growth under 50% of GFI's 839.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
37.40%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 92.37%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
37.40%
Operating income growth under 50% of GFI's 92.37%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
47.16%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 145.81%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
40.00%
EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 145.16%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
40.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 141.94%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above GFI's 8.95%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 8.95%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
Positive OCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
16.51%
Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
122.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 6.81%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-11.80%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
3.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 8.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-35.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 76.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
19.00%
Below 50% of GFI's 297.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-67.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 192.86%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
59.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 59.92% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
22.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.39% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-67.63%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
156.53%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 8.65%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.42%
1.25-1.5x GFI's 5.92%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-48.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 10716.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.