95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.88%
Positive revenue growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of GFI's 66244.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.65%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 18.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.65%
Operating income growth under 50% of GFI's 18.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.43%
Net income growth at 50-75% of GFI's 14.01%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
7.14%
EPS growth at 50-75% of GFI's 13.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 22.01%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
Positive OCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4.72%
Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
141.61%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-20.62%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
8.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 4.41%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
124.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-42.27%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
48.42%
Below 50% of GFI's 412.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-61.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 227.20%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
238.97%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
41.60%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
16.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 0.22%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.46%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.82%
Negative near-term dividend growth while GFI invests at 179.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.77%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.47%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.03%
Under 50% of GFI's 11.04%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.43%
We’re deleveraging while GFI stands at 9.72%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 770.42%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.