95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth under 50% of GFI's 13.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.02%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.37%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 21.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.37%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.02%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-29.69%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.56%
OCF growth under 50% of GFI's 27.35%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
3.57%
FCF growth under 50% of GFI's 50.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
157.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 137.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
0.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-19.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is at 201.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
74.58%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-55.47%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is 546.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 103.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
235.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
36.34%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
14.09%
Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while GFI stands at 540.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
65.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 129.03%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
56.16%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 7.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.39%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.