95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 21.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.30%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.75%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 71.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.75%
Negative operating income growth while GFI is at 71.16%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 264.95%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.06%
EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 255.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 244.44%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.09%
Share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 4.34%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.31%
Reduced diluted shares while GFI is at 3.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
25.60%
Dividend growth under 50% of GFI's 53.16%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-8.83%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.64%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 14.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
50.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 21.21%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
27.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 42.66%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
16.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 32.03%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
30.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 5.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
39.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to GFI's 41.19%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
24.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 13.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
0.37%
Below 50% of GFI's 619.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
183.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 301.31%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
212.45%
Below 50% of GFI's 697.38%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
98.34%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with GFI's 22.06%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
14.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 0.68%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.09%
Below 50% of GFI's 3033.85%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
39.29%
Below 50% of GFI's 201.31%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-3.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while GFI shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
238799900.00%
Inventory growth of 238799900.00% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.20%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 10.35%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.85%
Under 50% of GFI's 23.46%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-59.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.