PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.76%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-37.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.50%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.50%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
31.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 20.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
30.30%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 21.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 18.75%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 0.02%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-52.12%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-25.13%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.96%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 137.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-3.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-5.92%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 334.46%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
17.09%
Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
7.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 99.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
28.59%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
188.77%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
155.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 103.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
72.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 54.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
26.47%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 44.58%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
24.20%
Below 50% of GFI's 2248.68%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
49.75%
Below 50% of GFI's 540.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
70.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 129.03%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-31.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.56%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.00%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-11.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.