PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.87%
Positive revenue growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
18.63%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-2.88%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2.88%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-15.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.95%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.09%
Slight or no buyback while GFI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
7.85%
Dividend growth at 50-75% of GFI's 11.05%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders.
11.35%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 10.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
142.65%
FCF growth above 1.5x GFI's 14.30%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-35.57%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while GFI stands at 75.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-4.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while GFI stands at 29.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
4.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 22.95%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-46.91%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
2.05%
Below 50% of GFI's 56.38%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
29.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 106.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-26.72%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is at 187.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
218.14%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 302.75%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
112.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 96.80%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
69.51%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
34.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 21.96%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
24.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 42.04%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
91.37%
Stable or rising dividend while GFI is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
78.81%
Below 50% of GFI's 510.97%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
77.13%
Below 50% of GFI's 370.18%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
1.34%
AR growth of 1.34% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-6.70%
Inventory is declining while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.62%
Positive asset growth while GFI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.51%
Positive BV/share change while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
SG&A growth well above GFI's 70.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.