PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Positive revenue growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of GFI's 98.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.22%
Positive EBIT growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.22%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-25.44%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 47.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 43.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 43.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above GFI's 0.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.10%
Slight or no buyback while GFI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
Positive OCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
176.60%
Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
58.74%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to GFI's 55.91%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
55.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GFI's 51.75%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 7.47%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 69.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
110.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 39.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
7.26%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.96%
Below 50% of GFI's 2073.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
196.44%
Below 50% of GFI's 443.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-26.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 0.78%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
61.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 29.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
37.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 69.73%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
19.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to GFI's 19.78%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
144.99%
Below 50% of GFI's 1261.34%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
115.34%
Below 50% of GFI's 1606.06%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 5.01%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
80.90%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8195400.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.97%
Asset growth at 50-75% of GFI's 1.69%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.18%
Under 50% of GFI's 3.86%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.35%
We’re deleveraging while GFI stands at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.