PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GFI's 13.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.89%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
136.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x GFI's 21.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.14%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
188.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 20.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
194.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 21.05%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 18.75%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 137.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 94.05%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GFI's 57.40%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
164.17%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
60.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of GFI's 103.80%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
SG&A growth well above GFI's 70.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.