PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.96%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 17.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-75.96%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 37.56%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-97.83%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 204.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-97.83%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 204.88%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
182.08%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
183.33%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
183.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.32%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 25.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
28.32%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 214.71%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
6.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 31.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
6.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
6.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
3.80%
We show growth while KGC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.62%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.62%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.85%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 25.00%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.