PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.06%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-15.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1735.83%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1735.83%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3021.48%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 54.34%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2983.33%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 56.13%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2983.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 58.63%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1836.26%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 25.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1836.26%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 57.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-10.91%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC stands at 33.76%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-10.91%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-10.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.40%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.46%
We show growth while KGC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-26.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-26.93%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.28%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.