PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
35.21%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
35.21%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x KGC's 10.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
103.36%
EBIT growth similar to KGC's 97.62%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
103.36%
Operating income growth similar to KGC's 97.62%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
103.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x KGC's 45.57%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
103.35%
EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 48.72%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
103.35%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 45.62%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.25%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
86.25%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
17.30%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
17.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.60%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 100.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
10.87%
We show growth while KGC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.90%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.98%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.38%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 8.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.