PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.55%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of KGC's 26.85%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
20.55%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of KGC's 24.52%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
-8.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-56.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-83.65%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-83.65%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.10%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-92.10%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 15.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
26.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 4.19%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
26.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
21.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.99%
We show growth while KGC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 12.32%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.57%
Under 50% of KGC's 26.03%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.27%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 3.13%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.