PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.63%
Revenue growth similar to KGC's 32.14%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
34.63%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of KGC's 61.76%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
315.91%
EBIT growth above 1.5x KGC's 66.18%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
315.91%
Operating income growth above 1.5x KGC's 66.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
460.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x KGC's 54.17%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
-266.00%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 63.08%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-266.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 63.08%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4117.61%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 8.95%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
4117.61%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 38.71%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
48.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 152.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
48.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-24.46%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.29%
Inventory growth well above KGC's 3.60%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.98%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
15.09%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.37%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 3.45%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.