PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.65%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
38.65%
Gross profit growth similar to KGC's 37.85%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
73.73%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 531.58%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
73.73%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 531.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
58.05%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 627.87%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
63.85%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
63.85%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.32%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.32%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
82.36%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
82.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
36511827.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74837.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 110.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
25.00%
Inventory growth well above KGC's 11.20%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 4.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
15.43%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-11.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.27%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 80.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.