PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.32%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 409.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
21.32%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 409.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-498.04%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-498.20%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 566.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-498.20%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 566.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1345.03%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 146.06%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
1345.03%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 204.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-100.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-100.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3333.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 53.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1740.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 119.62%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
8252.36%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
8252.36%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
8577.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 54.91%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3578.51%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17000.92%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
16152.91%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.32%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.