95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.82%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
26.25%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
25.56%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
25.56%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.72%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.03%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.67%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 14.18%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
79.67%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 29.20%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
45.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-25.79%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
24.33%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
569.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1286.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 27.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 13.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 2.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.18%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.51%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.26%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.59%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 4.90%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.