95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.14%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.47%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 6.57%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.96%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-5.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.11%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 71.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.11%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 346.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
46.59%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.76%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
36.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 0.71%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-45.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 3.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.86%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
196.05%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
188.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
291.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 26.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 25.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.14%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.33%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 20.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.