PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.14%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 4.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
70.16%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 996.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
78.16%
EBIT growth 50-75% of KGC's 114.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
78.16%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of KGC's 114.40%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
96.62%
Net income growth comparable to KGC's 105.77%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
84.21%
EPS growth at 75-90% of KGC's 106.67%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
105.88%
Similar diluted EPS growth to KGC's 106.67%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.11%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-3124.58%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.04%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
36841732.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
59.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 20.82%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
14311.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26453.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 152.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1590.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 154.27%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.16%
AR growth well above KGC's 33.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-28.98%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
117.23%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
50.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.05%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.80%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.