PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.50%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.30%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.62%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 14.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-5.62%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 14.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.06%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.11%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.34%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-2.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
141.24%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
124.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.43%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-7.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 236.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
229.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of KGC's 318.72%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
874.54%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1188.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 173.03%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-88.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while KGC is at 57.23%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.81%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.45%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.70%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.