PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.49%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.48%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.13%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.13%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.66%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.21%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.66%
Reduced diluted shares while KGC is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.47%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.47%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
180.75%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
89.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
92.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
629.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
189.53%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 341.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
158.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of KGC's 188.99%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 44.83%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
261.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 115.29%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 17.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.93%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
27.56%
We have some new debt while KGC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.