95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.55%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 68.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-29.83%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 92.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.91%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 82.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.91%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 82.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.31%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 148.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.01%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 1.80%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while KGC is at 1.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 618.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.69%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 105.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
115.32%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
59.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 67.53%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
46.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 53.39%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
580.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 153.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
89.09%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 116.40%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
506.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 647.86%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
114.08%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of KGC's 180.37%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
934.37%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1372.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 68.51%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
249.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 155.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.67%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 14.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
Under 50% of KGC's 15.10%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-27.61%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.67%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 2.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.