PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of KGC's 9.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
428.44%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x KGC's 57.62%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x KGC's 57.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 107.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
133.33%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 107.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 107.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-7.04%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 57.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.53%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
201.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 72.86%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC stands at 36.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 369.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
13.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 318.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
Below 50% of KGC's 404.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-25.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 337.04%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 49.96%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 150.57%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 7.39%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
27.41%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 9.31%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-58.40%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 8.74%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.