95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.75%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.32%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.60%
EBIT growth 50-75% of KGC's 41.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
24.60%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of KGC's 41.22%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-0.65%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 18.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
94.44%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 195.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
88.89%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 195.65%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.02%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 24.90%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.57%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 149.06%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
118459836.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 29.29%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
221.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 44.13%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
104.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 53.59%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
6300.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
379.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to KGC's 408.53%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
143.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to KGC's 137.72%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
122932.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 551.45% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
363.33%
Below 50% of KGC's 757.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
176.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 90.93%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 314.09%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
86.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 64.84%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 29.27%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 10.19%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.84%
50-75% of KGC's 11.15%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-6.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.