PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.91%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 8.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.35%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 6.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.96%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 16.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.96%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 16.45%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.80%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.52%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-9.52%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.08%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.09%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.02%
Dividend growth of 0.02% while KGC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-0.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-82.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
56.04%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to KGC's 55.47%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
176.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 51.14%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
229.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 16.92%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
12196.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 126.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
268.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 11.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
426.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
10696.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 330.96% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
273.92%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 33.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
367.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 80.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2022.77%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 319.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
155.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 235.07%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
97.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 45.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.73%
AR growth well above KGC's 31.19%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 5.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-7.69%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 101.71%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.