PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.60%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.21%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.18%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.18%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
7.19%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.89%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.06%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.02%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
199.89%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while KGC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-2.13%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 38.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
453.95%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
571.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 19.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
174.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 30.77%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
295.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 13.57%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
9273.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 154.42%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
242.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 46.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
489.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 20.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
13730.08%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
280.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
321.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2138.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 262.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
158.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with KGC's 169.05%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
128.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 50.32%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.04%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.81%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.33%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 8.14%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.24%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 49.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.