Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Reduced diluted shares while KGC is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 62.19%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 80.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 2.74%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 474.65% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 50.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 385.79%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 284.45%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 43.04%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 42.08%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 11.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.01%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.07%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.

We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 10.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.