95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.93%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 10.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.34%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 7.98%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-16.55%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 32.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.55%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 32.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-15.36%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 46.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.00%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-44.44%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-25.60%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 370.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-394.81%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 78.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
474.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 87.01%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
155.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 109.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
104.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 16.24%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
318.78%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 120.90%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
198.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 136.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
151.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 58.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2734.24%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 506.45% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
292.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 196.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
215.81%
Below 50% of KGC's 738.06%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3071.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 299.36%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
146.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 46.27%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
59.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 45.88%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.09%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 6.63%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.54%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.44%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.10%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 56.98%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 18.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.