95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 127.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 111.53%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 111.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 103.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 104.62%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 104.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-7.83%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 13.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-109.37%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 126.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
436.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 57.76%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
232.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
3.23%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 251.37%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
275.62%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-10.86%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
355.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 16.19% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
299.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-35.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 0.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
41.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-13.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.36%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.