PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 11.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.53%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.45%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 48.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-18.18%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.24%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1085.59%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 6.89%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-24.65%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 92.71%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
222.96%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 13.96% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
186.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 38.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-57.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5331.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 1.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
123.30%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
41.24%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 317.42% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
57.80%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 7336.36%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.12%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.92%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.02%
We have some new debt while KGC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. KGC's 6.94%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.