PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.27%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of KGC's 12.36%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
9.27%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 40.40%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
9.27%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 40.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-92.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-94.44%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-94.44%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.20%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.19%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-60.06%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
17.39%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 87.15%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.48%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 256.80%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-11.70%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 46.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
132.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 29.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-29.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
118.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is 85.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while KGC stands at 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
40.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while KGC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-64.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.13%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.66%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.03%
We have some new debt while KGC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.