95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 10.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.49%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 117.50%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 103.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.71%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 103.29%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
124.21%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 104.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
123.81%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 104.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 104.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-14.72%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 17.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
114.79%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 248.84%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
233.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 16.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
3.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-19.84%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
275.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 214.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-21.68%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-39.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
36.10%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 15.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-70.63%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-72.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
379.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 13.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
52.05%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
AR growth well above KGC's 2.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.14%
Under 50% of KGC's 4.41%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.48%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.