PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 11.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
29.46%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of KGC's 41.78%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
37.40%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 193.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
37.40%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 193.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
47.16%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
40.00%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
40.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 6.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 5.19%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 47.27%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
16.51%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 169.20%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
122.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-11.80%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
3.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.41%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-35.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 178.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
19.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-67.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 99.28%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 1.91%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
59.92%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.39% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-67.63%
Negative near-term dividend growth while KGC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
156.53%
AR growth well above KGC's 95.56%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.42%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-48.50%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.