PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.82%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
27.82%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.04%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.04%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.61%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 110.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
35.71%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 109.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 109.95%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.90%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.99%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-47.91%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.34%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-582.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
179.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 17.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
0.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
13.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
185.85%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-22.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
9.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 89.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
84.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-50.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
302.23%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
57.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.03%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while KGC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-56.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while KGC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-15.57%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.37%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
90.51%
We have some new debt while KGC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 23.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.