PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of KGC's 9.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 73.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.65%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 115.84%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.65%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 115.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.43%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.14%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4.72%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
141.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 41.98%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-20.62%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
8.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
124.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-42.27%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is at 109.19%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 1.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
48.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-61.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.79%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
238.97%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
41.60%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
16.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.46%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.82%
Negative near-term dividend growth while KGC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.77%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.47%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.03%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.45%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.43%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.